What is better Bluehost or Siteground?

In this post, I am going to provide a comparison between two mammoths in the hosting game Bluehost vs Siteground. I will compare and contrast features such as speed, plans, backups, and uptime. After reading this comparison, I hope you will be armed with the knowledge to choose the technology that will enable you to reach your goals. 


Why is this Siteground vs. Bluehost comparison important?

The world is becoming more and more virtual year after year. We rely less on the physical world and more on the online metaphysical universe. With the virtualization of our everyday lives, web hosting has become more important than just a decade ago. Our devices are running off of applications that need a system of hosting resources. But what is the best computer network hardware (required for hosting) to transfer information and data over space? 

With that said, both web hosting services are great for beginners. Bluehost is the easiest to use, while SiteGround has more features, more value for money, and better performance. SiteGround is a better choice for hosting shared, WordPress, or cloud websites than Bluehost. While Bluehost offered slightly better rates, SiteGround's performance (speed), reliability (uptime), and support are much better than everything Bluehost offers.

Unlike Bluehost, SiteGround does not offer free domain names for a year. Instead, SiteGround offers domain name services, including domestic domain names, domain registration, privacy protection, hosting, and domain transfer. As a result, SiteGround is a little clearer and easier to use overall. Bluehost's backend may be straightforward, but it's also a customized version of Cpanel, meaning there's much more to get used to.

Siteground offers a 99.99% uptime guarantee, while Bluehost trades 99.9%. However, thanks to our tests, both finally managed to keep their respective promises. Siteground reached 99.999%, and Bluehost's plans were well below that, at 99.98%. Therefore, Siteground has a better uptime rate than Bluehost.

Even WordPress recognizes SiteGround and Bluehost as powerful providers and includes both in its exclusive list of recommended WordPress hosting services. So, despite intense competition from Bluehost, SiteGround finally wins the Siteground round against Bluehost WordPress Hosting. Currently, if you were to examine both tools for their popularity on Google, you'd discover that Bluehost is much more popular than SiteGround. In this comparison between SiteGround and Bluehost, we'll demystify the jargon and reveal what's important. Nevertheless, Siteground is the superior WordPress hosting service compared to Bluehost, which is massive.

I tried reaching out to the SiteGround and Bluehost live chat teams for help one after the other, and here are the results. Well, with all these similarities between the two providers, it's now understandable why comparing SiteGround to Bluehost can be pretty confusing at first. Then, regarding building sites, it turns out SiteGround and Bluehost partnered with Weebly. Bluehost and SiteGround use Apache+ NGINX web server technology, which runs NGINX for static and Apache for dynamic files. This leads me to the conclusion that Bluehost is adequately fast and reliable.

Then, to help you position yourself strategically within your primary traffic source areas, SiteGround and Bluehost have established data centers in several regions worldwide. Since SiteGround and Bluehost are two of the world's most popular web hosting companies, they're likely to be at the top of your list of things to consider. While you may be comfortable with Siteground hosting or Bluehost's offerings on a regular personal site, e-commerce sites can't afford to choose their hosts randomly. That said, the difference between SiteGround and Bluehost is more pronounced regarding their servers' response times.


My Bluehost Comparison to Siteground Findings

  1. SiteGround does not register domain names for free for a year, which I am not a fan of. 
  2. Bluehost is a tad cheaper and offers a free domain name.
  3. Siteground is a better option than Bluehost hosting shared, WordPress, or cloud websites.
  4. Because so many business websites use WordPress, and Siteground is a better WordPress host, I give the edge to Siteground.


Bluehost

If you are looking for a web hosting company for your WordPress website, Bluehost is a good choice. This web host has fast servers, and Google considers page speed when ranking sites. Bluehost can offer rates of up to two seconds, even for images. This host also offers a free site migration service.

While both web hosting companies have strong points, Bluehost has more storage and lower prices. However, Bluehost's performance and support aren't as good as SiteGround's. SiteGround was founded in 2004 and is owned by EIG, which also owns other web hosting companies. The company is headquartered in Bulgaria and has over 500 employees.

SiteGround offers 24/7 support. Customers can send email tickets and talk to natural live agents. The agents are also available to answer technical questions. If you run into trouble with your site, you can expect your site to be online in no time. SiteGround is more likely to offer a higher level of support than Bluehost.

While Bluehost is a more affordable option, SiteGround offers higher-quality support and better performance. In addition, SiteGround has better uptime averages and improved its technology infrastructure. It also provides managed WordPress hosting without costly costs. Therefore, SiteGround may be a better choice for your website, depending on your needs and budget.

SiteGround offers unlimited subdomains and parked domains. But unlike Bluehost, SiteGround doesn't offer a free domain name. For example, it costs about $16 for an a.com domain, while Bluehost provides one free with all plans. Furthermore, SiteGround offers unlimited subdomains and parts; its entry-level programs only allow you to park a maximum of five.

When choosing a web host, storage is a significant factor to consider. Ten gigabytes of storage is a good starting point for most projects. You can choose a higher-end plan if you need more space. For larger projects, you can opt for a dedicated server. These servers cost around $120 a month and offer more storage than their cheaper counterparts.

Bluehost also offers two plans for WordPress websites. They offer unlimited hosting for two domains, a free WordPress migration plugin, and unlimited email accounts. The basic plan is ideal for beginners, while the Bluehost Plus plan allows you to install a total number of sites and is more affordable.


SiteGround

SiteGround and Bluehost offer the ability to add your domain to your hosting account. Both services also feature a comprehensive control panel, but SiteGround's interface is easier to use than Bluehost's. In addition, both hosts provide a drag-and-drop website creation tool called Weebly.

When it comes to customer support, both companies provide excellent service. Customers can contact support via live chat, phone, or email. You can also visit their knowledge bases or documentation to find answers to frequently asked questions. While Bluehost has a dedicated support center that includes several categories, SiteGround's documentation is more comprehensive and up-to-date.

In terms of support, SiteGround has more options, including 24/7 live chat and email support. However, SiteGround is more expensive and will only be worth it if you're running a serious business. It's a good idea to compare both hosts' features and pricing before deciding which one is best for your needs.

For those who want a managed service, SiteGround is a great option. This company offers a wide range of plans, including those optimized for WordPress users. It also provides a free domain name and unlimited bandwidth. In addition, both companies offer a free trial to see how their services compare.

Regarding pricing, SiteGround is more expensive than Bluehost, and it's important to compare both plans. SiteGround offers a more flexible signup process. They offer SSL certificates, spam protection, and daily backups. If you're on a tight budget and don't mind a slower site, Bluehost may be a better option.

SiteGround's SuperCacher technology is also a great feature. It improves the speed of a website and reduces server load time. In addition, it has three levels of caching for faster loading of pages. Another feature is their NGINX Direct Delivery solution, which stores static web content in the server's RAM. This solution also speeds up the website loading time by serving resources directly from server RAM.

Despite their price differences, both hosts offer WordPress hosting. While Bluehost offers shared hosting plans, SiteGround has dedicated hosting for WordPress. The StartUp plan from SiteGround includes 10GB storage space, 10k visits a month allowance, daily backups, and advanced caching.


Briana Amster
Briana Amster

Incurable organizer. Hipster-friendly pop culture fan. Freelance coffee scholar. Award-winning food advocate. Proud twitter guru.